![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
My favorite Indian movie are Tum Bin and Muskaan On the surface, there is much going for Tum Bin.... The visuals are stunning, the locales bewitching and the performances generally competent. What's more, director Anubhav Sinha manages to keep the narrative on a tight leash, especially in the first half, and there's Jagjit Singh at his most soulful on the soundtrack. Why, then, does the film look — and taste — like a cake that is less cake and more icing? That's precisely whatTum Bin... is: a film that is completely bereft of vitality, a film that delivers much less than it promises. This is essentially picture postcard cinema that serves up a gruel dominated by worn-out clichés drawn from television soaps and the prettified shallowness of music videos. The somnolent storyline is low on sinews, and the delineation of the characters lacks psychological depth. The story goes something like this: Amar Shah (Rakesh Bapat), a successful Calgary businessman is in Mumbai for a day to pick up a wedding saree for his fiancée back in Canada, Pia (Sandali Sinha). He meets business consultant Shekhar Malhotra (Priyanshu Chatterjee) at a party and befriends him. Later that night, the airport-bound Amar, is run over by Shekhar's speeding car. End of lover boy number one.A guilt-ridden Shekhar flies to Calgary to make a clean breast of his culpability before Amar's family. Once there, the business whiz kid decides, instead, to help Pia turn around Amar's bankrupt firm. The two fall in love, but lover boy number two lets his feelings remain unexpressed for fear of being spurned. Then, a cherubic Richie Rich, lover boy number three Abhigyan (Himanshu Malik), walks into the picture, falls at first sight for Pia and, like Shekhar, is unable to bring himself to propose to her until it is too late. And as the climax draws nigh, all the clichés tumble forth in a hurry: a cop arrives all the way from Mumbai to arrest Shekhar, the latter finally lets Pia know that he actually loves her and then promptly meets with an accident and ends up in an ICU, Amar's father (Vikram Gokhale) who'd been struck dumb by the untimely death of his son suddenly gets his voice back and… does it really matter anymore where the merry-go- round eventually stops? Tum Bin suffers the most on account of the way the heroine's character is skimmed over. She's a businesswoman supposedly bred entirely in Calgary, but she addresses Shekhar as "Mr Shekhar", in keeping with Bollywood's worst pidgin traditions, wears salwar-kameez suits that Karol Bagh hausfraus wouldn't touch and insists on looking like a babe in the woods. To make matters worse, Sandali Sinha, though she does try gamely, simply doesn't have the personality or the presence to breathe a sense of purpose into the poorly etched character. Rakesh Bapat vanishes from the scene before you can utter his name, but Priyanshu and Himanshu do an admirable job of acting lovelorn. In a film like Tum Bin..., that's half the battle won. Unfortunately for the duo, the tepid script robs them of the opportunity to fight the rest of the battle. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| There’s a guy, who’s a fashion designer, named Sameer (Aftab Shivdisani) who is searching for his dream girl to wear the dress he designed. He works with his close friends Janvi (Neha of Rahul and Fiza fame), Sharad (Parvin Dabas of Monsoon Wedding), Satin (Vrajesh Hirjee of Mujhe Kuch Kehna Hai and other sidekick roles) and Shikha (Anjala Zaveri, who is more famous in Southern film).Its obvious that Janvi loves Sameer, but he is too blind to see it. Sharad loves Janvi, but she is too blind to see it. One day, Sameer dials a, OOPS, wrong number to Muskaan (played by Gracy Singh). Now this wrong number is strange because for 1) it goes to a hostel, and 2) it seems as if Muskaan is the receptionist who is the only one who ever answers the phone. Frankly, Gracy does not suit the school girl role, because she does not fit the profile (she looks old and tired).Anyway, Sameer and Muskaan begin talking but do not tell each other their names. And surprise surprise, they fall in love, but do not bother telling each other. Both must leave town so they decide to meet on January 1st at . . . (you can guess where because its been seen in so many other films). So, they both head to Shimla. Sameer needs a runway model and Muskaan fits the bill. After meeting each other (but not knowing they are phone friends), they hate each other, then become friends, and then fall in love. Huh? But they are already in love with their phone friend. Yes yes its very confusing. And a song insertion every 5 minutes does not help the plot move on. Janvi gets killed right after she threatens Muskaan to stay away from Sameer. Before she dies she write the letter S in blood. But wait, by coincidence, the remaining friends all have their names begin with the letter S. Who could the killer be? Do you really want to know? What happens to the love story? Is it all wrapped up by the end? You bet, but was it worth the trouble? No. problem with Muskaan is that there are so many plots that the viewer loses track that a movie is going on. I must admit Aftab and Gracy make a valiant effort to share on-screen chemistry but the director fails in this casting. Their acting is average at most and neither of them truly shine to their acting capabilities. Aftab is more suitable to comedic roles and Gracy needs to pick more diversified roles to gain better exposure in Bollywood. The friends, could’ve been played by any side characters seen in films because their roles seems forced in the story. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |